Rules
Schmules
Yes, Mr. King is one author who knows his stuff. If
you haven’t read “On Writing” yet, and you have any plans to write at all, then
by all means, do get it. He offers valuable insights into the nitty gritty of
writing that go beyond your usual “anyone can do this if they just learn ___
& ___.”
The sad fact is that not everyone can do the writing
thing. Mr. King is pretty clear on that, but it’s not only because some people
aren’t talented at writing. There are people who can write very well, but they
won’t make a career out of it for any number of reasons. Perhaps they just
don’t enjoy it. Maybe the rest of their lives are too busy to focus on writing.
Others find it too hard at some point in the process and give up.
But, I’m convinced that those who are serious about
writing, no matter what their goals or genres, all have one thing in common.
They
know the rules, and they know how to break them.
Like Stephen King, I agree that “good
writing consists of mastering the fundamentals (vocabulary, grammar, the
elements of style)” (On
Writing, p 142). If you want to write,
especially for purposes of publication, know your stuff. I’m talking basic,
bare bones grammar first and foremost. Expand that knowledge to style and
beyond that to fantastic storytelling, and you’ll find yourself at least a
competent, if not good, writer.
And it’s these good
writers who go on to learn how they can break the rules without readers so much
as batting an eye.
Case in point: The first Heather Graham novel I read, “The Vision”, was liberally showered with adverbs and passive
voice (was / had), but it was still a darn good story. Not a blockbuster hit,
mind you, but good enough to keep me turning the pages. I only noticed these
rule breakers because of my wonderful critique partners. I love them, mind you,
but some could masquerade as adverb and passive voice exterminators at night.
You see, I’m certain after
having written dozens of books, that Heather Graham knows the rules just like
Stephen King knows the rules. But, like him and other good / great writers,
she’s developed her storytelling ability to the point that she can break the
rules and get away with it.
"I broke the rules and I liked it." |
Not everyone can do this,
especially in the beginning. If you attempt to break the writing rules too
early, you risk looking like a drunken wino who smells of adverb dependence and
stale clichés. When you reach the point where your storytelling ability can
benefit from an exceptionally placed adverb or comfortable cliché, then you’re
more like a sexy redhead in a sequined dress sipping expensive red wine at an
upscale bar.
Writing in spite of rules
takes confidence, people. But, it doesn’t arrive overnight by FedEx. Like a
fine wine, it must improve with age and careful tending. Eventually, if you’re
dedicated enough, you can hold your head high and proclaim: “Rules schmules—who
needs ‘em?”
I agree with every word of this. I've been complaining bitterly for years about the ridiculous rules imposed by creative writing groups. Go for it, Mysti !!
ReplyDelete